The competition in all segments of life has turned the face of globalization. Enteurepreneurs from different realms have utilized cutting-edge technology and incorporated unprecedented business plans to emerge as leaders in respective fields. But would the success and diversification around us have been possible if the thinkers would have executed their plan of action in isolation without getting into a debate or objection for their plans of action?
Its indeed a proven fact that ideas jostling agsinst conter arguments tend to look up to a broader scenario and provide a holistic version to the objective. Sustenance in isolation is not possible in todays competitive world. One cannot overlook the counter effects of objectives and persist with one's own view. Its crucial to team up and analyze different aspects of the opinion from different individuals. There might be a possibility that we rule out the inevitable while incorporating a plan which could be pin-pointed by the critique otherwise leading us into trouble waters. Exemplifying the fact by the recent nuclear proliferation carried out by Iran for harnessing nuclear science to tackle energy crisis. The US and its allies were completely against such an idea and the world prognosticated another devastating war. An organization like the United Nations expressed its counter view and meddled to placate the cold war. The meetings and debates eventually led the superpower realize the importance of abating the war as it would create global insecurity and disrespect for the former. Had'nt there been a contrasting view provided to the US strategy, we could have witnessed the superpowers going on another rampant destruction.
Moreover, the debates and meetings that often take up a boisterous path provide knowlegable ideas and views that would have been restricted if the decision would have been handed overto a single party. After discussing cons for the objective can we actually discover the tenuous aspects that would have otherwise led to a debacle. People with differnt opinions and conoisseurs in specific fields help out the objective by avoiding the counter-productive aspects attached to it. A holistic approach is taken and that leads to a better realized objective. Thats the primary reason why emphasis is laid onto team work and unanimity in expression in all emerging processes that rules out individual tyranny of imposing theirideas onto other that might be counter-productive.
Fortifying the fact through an example; a slight modification in enhancing a complex module for a product requires to ponder deep and investigate the aftermaths of the changes. A slightly digressing approach can create blunders to the organization's reputation. A thorough brainstorming session regarding the plan of execution is required in which flegling professionals and connoiseurs from different units participate and put forward respective suggestions. Many different approaches are to be looked at before arriving at a final decision. The naive corrected for his ideas gets to learn in abundance and the connoiseurs play a major hand in averting any imminent crisis. Had there be no counter view the afteraffects would have been detrimental.
Alltogether, rather than having an egoistic approach we should be open to accept criticism and countering ideas so that we are able to view the other side of the coin. Objections would eventually arouse a desire to strengthen our ideas and come up with stronger viewpoints to corroborate our stand. This would imbue a sense of fortification to the primoridal idea orobjective and help us emerge with a stronger plan in terms of analysis. A stronger platform would help us attain greater heights. A mosaic looks more majestic when it has colors of contrasting nuances and portrays artistic supremacy.
Its indeed a proven fact that ideas jostling agsinst conter arguments tend to look up to a broader scenario and provide a holistic version to the objective. Sustenance in isolation is not possible in todays competitive world. One cannot overlook the counter effects of objectives and persist with one's own view. Its crucial to team up and analyze different aspects of the opinion from different individuals. There might be a possibility that we rule out the inevitable while incorporating a plan which could be pin-pointed by the critique otherwise leading us into trouble waters. Exemplifying the fact by the recent nuclear proliferation carried out by Iran for harnessing nuclear science to tackle energy crisis. The US and its allies were completely against such an idea and the world prognosticated another devastating war. An organization like the United Nations expressed its counter view and meddled to placate the cold war. The meetings and debates eventually led the superpower realize the importance of abating the war as it would create global insecurity and disrespect for the former. Had'nt there been a contrasting view provided to the US strategy, we could have witnessed the superpowers going on another rampant destruction.
Moreover, the debates and meetings that often take up a boisterous path provide knowlegable ideas and views that would have been restricted if the decision would have been handed overto a single party. After discussing cons for the objective can we actually discover the tenuous aspects that would have otherwise led to a debacle. People with differnt opinions and conoisseurs in specific fields help out the objective by avoiding the counter-productive aspects attached to it. A holistic approach is taken and that leads to a better realized objective. Thats the primary reason why emphasis is laid onto team work and unanimity in expression in all emerging processes that rules out individual tyranny of imposing theirideas onto other that might be counter-productive.
Fortifying the fact through an example; a slight modification in enhancing a complex module for a product requires to ponder deep and investigate the aftermaths of the changes. A slightly digressing approach can create blunders to the organization's reputation. A thorough brainstorming session regarding the plan of execution is required in which flegling professionals and connoiseurs from different units participate and put forward respective suggestions. Many different approaches are to be looked at before arriving at a final decision. The naive corrected for his ideas gets to learn in abundance and the connoiseurs play a major hand in averting any imminent crisis. Had there be no counter view the afteraffects would have been detrimental.
Alltogether, rather than having an egoistic approach we should be open to accept criticism and countering ideas so that we are able to view the other side of the coin. Objections would eventually arouse a desire to strengthen our ideas and come up with stronger viewpoints to corroborate our stand. This would imbue a sense of fortification to the primoridal idea orobjective and help us emerge with a stronger plan in terms of analysis. A stronger platform would help us attain greater heights. A mosaic looks more majestic when it has colors of contrasting nuances and portrays artistic supremacy.
Comments