The constitution has provided us with the three stout conglomerates - the executive, the legislature and the judiciary. The effective governance of these bodies are the rudimentry ingredients for a nation to grow and flourish. The judiciary is inevitably the closest to the yeoman. The laws imposed by the judiciary are indeed socialist and irrespective of any regional, communal, cultural or economic bias. But should the laws be flexible to take account of various circumstances, times and place?
A flexible law structure would ensure that there is little or very less injustince being done to the victim who would have been a scapegoat of malacious circumstances. It would take into consideration a deluge of factors before arriving to a conclusion. Notwitstanding the accused might get a reprieve and all charges enthrusted upon him might get rejected. But the primariy concern would be to keep our corrupt society isolated from the misuse of offered resiliance.
To maintain proper law and order we should ensure that there are no predjudices in the society. And moreover, the flexibility provided in the law structure would certainly give way to lawlesness and sheer disorder. The aristocrats would be in a situation to dictate terms to the judiciary by bribing witnesses, advocates and judges as there would be some flexibility in the law-book that would ensure exoneration to the accused. Secondly, this would lead to hue and cry if the decision is turned against the conceiter. Rather, this would lead to nation wide protests and the devastation could be beyond control. The criminals would be consulting shrewd lawyers before planning henious strategies so as to stave off from charges and covet the benefit of doubt in their favor.
Moreover, the laws imposed on the citizens should be unanimous and there should be no room for lobbying. Equal rights granted to the citizens should be intact to ensure a congenial environment for the citizens. This would ensure that decisions made are unbiased and ensuring the prime objective of judiciary. A rigid law structure would therefore be in alignment the nations socialistic goals and would provide impetus for constant upbringing of the society.
A flexible law structure would ensure that there is little or very less injustince being done to the victim who would have been a scapegoat of malacious circumstances. It would take into consideration a deluge of factors before arriving to a conclusion. Notwitstanding the accused might get a reprieve and all charges enthrusted upon him might get rejected. But the primariy concern would be to keep our corrupt society isolated from the misuse of offered resiliance.
To maintain proper law and order we should ensure that there are no predjudices in the society. And moreover, the flexibility provided in the law structure would certainly give way to lawlesness and sheer disorder. The aristocrats would be in a situation to dictate terms to the judiciary by bribing witnesses, advocates and judges as there would be some flexibility in the law-book that would ensure exoneration to the accused. Secondly, this would lead to hue and cry if the decision is turned against the conceiter. Rather, this would lead to nation wide protests and the devastation could be beyond control. The criminals would be consulting shrewd lawyers before planning henious strategies so as to stave off from charges and covet the benefit of doubt in their favor.
Moreover, the laws imposed on the citizens should be unanimous and there should be no room for lobbying. Equal rights granted to the citizens should be intact to ensure a congenial environment for the citizens. This would ensure that decisions made are unbiased and ensuring the prime objective of judiciary. A rigid law structure would therefore be in alignment the nations socialistic goals and would provide impetus for constant upbringing of the society.
Comments